FrecNet FrecNet

Bringing you websites with no content since 1998


Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
in-place_versus_separate_prints_for_moving_joints [2024/02/01 18:40] jasonhin-place_versus_separate_prints_for_moving_joints [2024/02/01 18:44] (current) jasonh
Line 23: Line 23:
 After printing and the satisfying "snap" when moving the joint, the joint itself is looser than the printed-separately one. It's easy to see why, that 0.3mm gap around the shafts isn't tight enough. After printing and the satisfying "snap" when moving the joint, the joint itself is looser than the printed-separately one. It's easy to see why, that 0.3mm gap around the shafts isn't tight enough.
  
-{{:img_4231.jpeg?400|}} Comparing the two joints, the printed in separate pieces is on the left and the print in place on the right. You can see the shafts are a much tighter fit on the printed separately. So for a small articulated figure, it's looking like avoiding in-place printing is the best option if you want stiff joints.+{{:img_4231.jpeg?400 |}}Comparing the two joints, the printed in separate pieces is on the left and the print in place on the right. You can see the shafts are a much tighter fit on the printed separately. So for a small articulated figure, it's looking like avoiding in-place printing is the best option if you want stiff joints.
  
-Printed on a BambuLab P1S.+//Printed on a Bambu Lab P1S, 0.4mm nozzle, Smooth High Temp plate, 0.16mm Optimal quality.//

in-place_versus_separate_prints_for_moving_joints.1706812808.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/02/01 18:40 by jasonh